Google Books is About Readers, Sergey Brin Says

Google cofounder Sergey Brin has some choice words for Microsoft, Amazon, Yahoo, and anyone else who opposes the into e-books: Back off, we're trying to help the readers. Notably, Brin says this is not an issue of consumer choice, because without releasing the scanned e-books, there's no choice at all, save for traveling to obscure libraries around the world. "The agreement limits consumer choice in out-of-print books about as much as it limits consumer choice in unicorns," Brin wrote. In an op-ed for the New York Times, Brin challenges some of the arguments critics have raised against the project and resulting settlement with authors and publishers. The opposition includes Amazon, whose Kindle e-reader has its own bookstore; and Microsoft, which was scanning books itself but shut down the project amid the Google controversy.

Barnes & Noble, which also runs an e-book store, has been fairly quiet on the matter, while Sony, a maker of e-readers, has supported the settlement. It's not fair, they argue, that Google was able to scan first and settle with authors and publishers later, because any new attempt to compete would require author and publisher agreements from scratch. Brin's argument is not flawless. Nor does he get into the legal issues of holding royalty payments for missing rights holders - a concern raised by several state attorneys general. He doesn't really address concerns from Germany, which said the settlement would harm copyright law, privacy and its authors.

But I think Brin avoided the fine details on purpose and focused instead on the main point: Without the Google Books settlement, out-of-print books will be out of reach, and maybe even gone forever. The settlement has already been delayed indefinitely while ch anges are made, and I think Brin's thoughts would've had the most weight in September, when this issue was on fire. Why make this argument now? Perhaps the answer is in Brin's allusion to the electric car, citing a scanned book from 1916 that says the idea didn't catch on due to the "failure of the manufacturers to properly educate the general public regarding the wonderful utility of the electric." If public opinion is falling out of Google's favor, there's never a bad time to remind readers what the Google Books settlement is good for. This op-ed was for them.

US relationship with ICANN may not end

A longtime agreement in which the U.S. Department of Commerce has oversight of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is due to expire Wednesday, but that may not be the end of the relationship. This new type of agreement would allow ICANN to become more independent, while addressing concerns from several other countries that the U.S. has too much control over ICANN, said Michael Palage, a former ICANN board member. While ICANN isn't talking, some observers expect a new type of agreement to be announced as soon as Wednesday, with the U.S. government sharing oversight of the nonprofit organization that controls the Internet's domain name system with other countries. The new agreement would create several oversight boards, with international representation, Palage said.

What it's also doing is ... it's putting in some accountability mechanisms." Palage hasn't heard all the details about the new agreement, including how people will be appointed to the new oversight panels. The Economist reported last week that a new agreement, called an affirmation of commitments, will replace the existing pact between the U.S. government and ICANN. The Department of Commerce and ICANN have operated under a series of agreements laying out expectations for the nonprofit since November 1998. The new agreement "will tell them what it should do, but it can't legally bind them," much like past agreements, said Palage, now a senior fellow at the Progress and Freedom Foundation, a conservative think tank. "It gives the appearance in the global community that the U.S. government has recognized that ICANN has done what is was supposed to do. He's also concerned about whether private entities will have the same representation as governments. Many critics of ICANN have complained in recent years that the organization has moved forward with plans to expand services without widespread agreement. While not perfect, the new agreement being talked about would be an improvement over the existing agreement, he said. "Now while the devil will be in the detail, the only concern I have is that the private sector be on equal footing with the public sector in being able to hold ICANN accountable," he said. "If ICANN is to remain a public-private partnership that is founded on the principles of openness, transparency, inclusiveness, accountability and bottom-up coordination, then both the private and public sectors should have equal confidence in the accountability mechanism available to them." Under the latest agreement between the Department of Commerce and ICANN, the nonprofit reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining the security and stability of the domain name system, or DNS. ICANN also promised to stick to the principles of competition, bottom-up coordination and representation. In particular, ICANN's board in June 2008 voted to allow an unlimited number of new generic top-level domains, such as .food or .basketball, but trademark owners have complained that new gTLDs would force them to register many new Web sites to protect their brands.

Asked this week about what happens after the current agreement expires, an ICANN spokeswoman said the Department of Commerce has asked ICANN officials not to comment until Wednesday. Last week, several members of a U.S. Congress subcommittee urged ICANN to back off the gTLD plan until concerns could be resolved. A representative of Viviane Reding, the European commissioner in charge of the information society and the telecom industry, also declined to comment until "the situation in the U.S. has been officially confirmed." Reding has called for more international oversight of ICANN. But Steve DelBianco, executive director of NetChoice, an e-commerce trade group, said he expects a "new formal review process looking at security, consumer trust, and the interests of global Internet users." DelBianco expects that government and private stakeholders will be represented in the new review process, he said. "Prodded by public comments and encouragement from Congress, I'd expect to see a new arrangement that delivers what the global Internet community has wanted: an independent ICANN that preserves private-sector leadership with increased accountability to its core mission," he said. "The tricky part is how to give governments a well-defined role while preserving ICANN's private-sector orientation." An important part of the oversight going forward will likely be on cybersecurity, added DelBianco, a critic of ICANN's gTLD plan. "I'd expect to see explicit accountability for ICANN to make sure the DNS stays up 24-7 and around the world, even as we see increased cyber attacks and a significant expansion of top-level domains," he said. Heather Greenfield, a spokeswoman for the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA), said the trade group expects the U.S. government to stay involved in ICANN. CCIA has also heard that oversight panels, involving the international community, will provide ICANN oversight going forward, she said. "We expect ICANN will retain some type of long-term relationship with the United States, while expanding the involvement of other countries," she added. "Ahead of this agreement ending, ICANN has been making a real effort to respond to past criticism about not being transparent enough."

3 Basic Steps to Avoid Joining a Botnet

Banging the drum for security awareness never gets old. Online, the biggest battle these days is against botnets: networks of infected computers which hackers can use - unbeknownst to the machine's owner - for online crimes including sending out spam or launching a denial of service attack. As much as CSOs try to get folks to bone up on safe practices (both online and in the office), there are always going to be some who need reminding.

Unfortunately, the black-hat techniques employed to snare users into a botnet web have evolved to a level that makes them often undetectable by even the most sophisticated security products. Santorelli, director of global outreach with the non-profit security investigations firm Team Cymru, spends his days monitoring malicious online activity, particularly botnets. Combine that with a lack of user knowledge, and the threat of infection becomes very high. (See: Botnets: Why it's Getting Harder to Find and Fight Them). "The frustrating thing is they can make their chances of getting infected much, much smaller," said Steve Santorelli, who sees how users fall prey to easily avoidable traps every day. Santorelli notes that while just one strategy probably won't cover you, with several tools in the tool box, the rate of infection within an organization significantly drops. They might not realize the importance of working with IT to ensure they are up to date with patching and software upgrades. Tip 1: Have work AND home machines regularly updated with patches and antivirus software The average user doesn't necessarily have a lot of technological knowledge, said Santorelli.

This problem may be especially prevalent among workers who are exclusively remote. Sophos scanned 583 computers for 40 days and found that 81 percent of the machines failed one or more basic security checks. In fact, a study conducted by security firm Sophos last year found most computer users ignore security updates and turn off their firewalls. Most machines, 63 percent, were lacking security patches for the operating system, office application and programs like Windows Media Player and Adobe Flash. Those are exactly the folks that criminals love. "These people are going to go for the low-hanging fruit and unfortunately there is a lot of it out there," said Santorelli. "There are so many machines without updated AV on it." If your patching system isn't automated, your users need to be made aware of the risks they are taking by working with unpatched and out-dated security technologies. More than half, 51 percent, had disabled their firewall and another 15 percent had outdated or disabled antivirus and anti-spam software.

And while security updates are not the cure-all for malware infection, Santorelli said they certainly serve as a strong deterrent. "If you are walking down the street as a burglar and you see a house with a Rottweiler, and a visible sign from a security company, you probably won't attack that house," he noted. Unfortunately, that's less and less foolproof. "It used to be that if you surfed to places like CNN, or the Weather Channel, you weren't going to come across great deal of malware," said Santorelli. "That isn't the case anymore. Tip 2: Use the latest browser versions Staying away from dubious sites and sticking to known brands used to offer reasonable online safety. We've seen a number of cases recently where people have gone to a legitimate web site and there is an advertisement up there hosting some kind of malicious code." That is where the latest safe browsing technologies can help, said Santorelli. There is also a great deal of anti-phishing and anti malware that goes into them now. The latest versions of today's browsers will often flag potentially dangerous content. "Browsers are so much more secure now that so many of the holes that existed in these browsers have been patched.

So if you try and go to a link that contains malware, your AV might not pick it up. You can download the latest version of Internet Explorer or Firefox fairly easily and quickly, too (See: IE or Firefox: Which is More Secure?). "It will only take you five minutes to have the latest browser technology," said Santorelli. "It is just another string to your bow, so to speak." Tip 3: Be a little more careful when you get a link or an attachment. "Don't just blindly click on things and rely on other people to protect your computer," noted Santorelli. "You've got to take some responsibility for your own security." Team Cymru research reveals that the most common attack vectors for installing malware continue to be links in emails, or drive-by downloads. "We know from our recent investigations that there is a great deal of success to be had [for hackers] by just sending links out," he said. But your browser will say: "Are you sure?" The good news is most browsers are free. Just because you receive the email from someone you know and trust, it doesn't mean it is safe. See Five More Facebook, Twitter Scams to Avoid for examples of current attempts to exploit social media sites. This includes friends and family, whose systems or accounts may have been compromised, and also well-known web sites you use, like social networking sites or banks.

And large banks, such as Bank of America, often find their name is used in email phishing scams where thieves send out messages warning that customers their account has been compromised with a link that leads to a fake, but very legitimate-looking login screen. Of course, whether or not you should click any link or attachment also depends on if you have complied with steps 1 and 2 above. "You're going to have to take it on a case-by-case basis," said Santorelli "And my concern would be significantly raised if I didn't have my computer up to date with antivirus and browsing technologies."

Broadband will connect 20% of households worldwide this year, Gartner projects

Research firm Gartner is projecting that 20% of households worldwide will be connected to the Internet through a broadband connection by year-end. Following behind South Korea in broadband penetration rate are the Netherlands (80%), Denmark (75%), Hong Kong (72%), Canada (69%) and Switzerland (69%). Gartner says that the United States lags behind many developed countries with a 60% broadband penetration rate, although this still ranks the United States ahead of countries such as Japan (58%), Germany (55%), Australia (55%) and Sweden (54%). Over the next four years, however, Gartner expects broadband penetration in the United States to rise rapidly, as it is projected to add 27 million new connections and hit a penetration rate 78% by 2013. If the United States is successful in adding these new connections, Gartner projects that it will leapfrog several countries that it now trails in terms of broadband penetration rate, including New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Norway. WiMAX changes lives in rural Thailand In all, Gartner projects that 422 million households worldwide will have a fixed broadband connection by the end of this year, an increase of 10.5% from the 382 million households that had a fixed broadband connection at the end of 2008. Looking further down the road, Gartner projects that 580 million households worldwide will have a fixed broadband connection, an increase of 37% over the number projected to have broadband by the end of 2009. South Korea is currently the leader in household broadband penetration, Gartner reports, as 86% of South Korean households have broadband connections.

South Korea is still projected to be the king of broadband penetration, however, as Gartner predicts that 93% of South Korean households will be connected to the Web via broadband in 2013. Gartner also predicts that developing countries will add 135 million new broadband connections over the next four years, with Brazil, Russia, India and China accounting for more than two-thirds of new connections in the developing world and nearly half of all new connections worldwide.

EMC executive takes over at storage vendor Xiotech

EMC executive Alan Atkinson is taking over as CEO of Xiotech, a storage company that just secured $10 million in new financing. Glassmeyer is also general partner of Oak Investment Partners, which owns a majority stake in Xiotech. Nine data storage companies to watch Atkinson was co-founder and CEO of WysDM, a data protection vendor sold to EMC in April 2008. Atkinson remained at EMC as vice president of the company's Storage Software Group, but on Thursday was announced as Xiotech's new CEO. Xiotech said its previous CEO, Casey Powell, will remain on the board of directors and will be a "strategic advisor to Atkinson." "With his extensive knowledge of and experience with data storage, Alan Atkinson is the right leader to take Xiotech to the next level," Ed Glassmeyer of Xiotech's board of directors said in an announcement. Atkinson's 21-year career includes positions at StorageNetworks, Goldman Sachs and AT&T Bell Laboratories.

Xiotech, based in Eden Prairie, Minn., plans to use the cash to expand its Intelligent Storage Element technology with new products to be released early next year. He takes over at Xiotech just after the company announced a $10 million funding round from private investors. Xiotech says its ISE architecture is designed to provide 100% usable storage capacity, to improve efficiency but without a performance hit. Atkinson marked his first day on the job at Xiotech with a blog post. "I can honestly say, after 20+ years in the storage industry (I'm really not THAT old), I've never seen a company this size with so many talented storage folks," he wrote. "We have more patents than most companies five times our size." Follow Jon Brodkin on Twitter